<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tools of the Trade: Choosing a Budget Mini-Cam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yalsa.ala.org/blog/2008/07/04/tools-of-the-trade-choosing-a-budget-mini-cam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yalsa.ala.org/blog/2008/07/04/tools-of-the-trade-choosing-a-budget-mini-cam/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Young Adult Library Services Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Wilk</title>
		<link>http://yalsa.ala.org/blog/2008/07/04/tools-of-the-trade-choosing-a-budget-mini-cam/comment-page-1/#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Wilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yalsa.ala.org/blog/?p=1191#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>My review of the Flip Ultra (MSRP $149.99)...

***Upsides***

* an hour of recording time
* relatively high-resolution screen, which can be used in daylight
* good video quality (640 x 480, 4.0 Mbps, 30 frames per second)
* records sound comparatively well
* fast lens for decent low-light quality
* uses external batteries, which allows for longer shelf-life
* very easy to use software, which offers basic editing and direct upload to a few video services

***Downsides***

* no flip-out screen, making it harder to record yourself
* short, flip-out USB arm is not as friendly to desktops and can take up a lot of USB real estate (unless you buy an extension cable, sold separately)
* stills from video only (which are going to be lower quality than if it also functioned as a digital camera)

The Flip Video works great for librarians who are going to be recording other people, and its fairly decent mic even makes it a reasonable option for sound-heavy videos like presentations, author talks, and library music performances.  Its video quality and ease of use will allow you to put comparatively high-quality videos online with no trouble.  However, librarians who can only budget for a single digital camera/camcorder solution, or those who will often be recording themselves for booktalks (etc.), might wish to look elsewhere.

I loved the videocasting from Annual this year, by the way.  What a great way to bring the conference home in a visceral fashion for those of us who couldn&#039;t make it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My review of the Flip Ultra (MSRP $149.99)&#8230;</p>
<p>***Upsides***</p>
<p>* an hour of recording time<br />
* relatively high-resolution screen, which can be used in daylight<br />
* good video quality (640 x 480, 4.0 Mbps, 30 frames per second)<br />
* records sound comparatively well<br />
* fast lens for decent low-light quality<br />
* uses external batteries, which allows for longer shelf-life<br />
* very easy to use software, which offers basic editing and direct upload to a few video services</p>
<p>***Downsides***</p>
<p>* no flip-out screen, making it harder to record yourself<br />
* short, flip-out USB arm is not as friendly to desktops and can take up a lot of USB real estate (unless you buy an extension cable, sold separately)<br />
* stills from video only (which are going to be lower quality than if it also functioned as a digital camera)</p>
<p>The Flip Video works great for librarians who are going to be recording other people, and its fairly decent mic even makes it a reasonable option for sound-heavy videos like presentations, author talks, and library music performances.  Its video quality and ease of use will allow you to put comparatively high-quality videos online with no trouble.  However, librarians who can only budget for a single digital camera/camcorder solution, or those who will often be recording themselves for booktalks (etc.), might wish to look elsewhere.</p>
<p>I loved the videocasting from Annual this year, by the way.  What a great way to bring the conference home in a visceral fashion for those of us who couldn&#8217;t make it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Braun</title>
		<link>http://yalsa.ala.org/blog/2008/07/04/tools-of-the-trade-choosing-a-budget-mini-cam/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Braun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yalsa.ala.org/blog/?p=1191#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>I am a huge fan of the Flip. The videos posted on the blog from ALA Annual were all shot with that camera. Good quality - picture and sound - for something so small and inexpensive. I also like that you can grab still photos from frames in a Flip video. Because of that it ends up that I use the Flip not just for video but for stills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge fan of the Flip. The videos posted on the blog from ALA Annual were all shot with that camera. Good quality &#8211; picture and sound &#8211; for something so small and inexpensive. I also like that you can grab still photos from frames in a Flip video. Because of that it ends up that I use the Flip not just for video but for stills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

