Recently, a man named Wesley Scroggins wrote an opinion piece in the News-Leader (Springfield, MO) in which he condemns three books: Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five, Sarah Ockler's Twenty Boy Summer, and Laurie Halse Anderson's Speak. From the perspective of a teenager, a student, and a person, I have a lot to say about this, especially concerning Speak.
In his own words, Scroggins calls Speak â€œsoft pornographyâ€. This totally freaks me out. If he had chosen the word 'disturbing' or 'terrifying', I could maybe understand his reaction. His word choice seems to imply that the fact that Melinda (the protagonist) is raped is irrelevant. What's more important to point out to the school board is that there is SEX in a book that CHILDREN are reading in SCHOOLS. This is one of my biggest issues with book banning. In so many instances a book will be challenged because it mentions something that scares people, whether it is sex or drugs or swear words. It only takes a few f bombs for a book to be placed on the â€œbadâ€ list. What is pretty consistently overlooked in these cases it the impact of a novel as a whole, mostly because challenged books are so rarely read by their challengers.
Rape is a serious, scary issue that affects the people from whom Scroggins is trying to keep this book. What makes it more relevant, in my opinion, is the fact that Speak deals with date rape: something fuzzy, difficult to define, and largely unreported. In a time where â€œshe was asking for itâ€ and â€œI was drunk and it's not his faultâ€ are acceptable explanations, Speak is more important than ever.
When I first read Speak, I was close to Melinda's age. Reading it, all I could think was: â€œWhy isn't she saying anything? How can she just let him get away with that?â€ But then I realized something important; Wesley Scroggins is not my parent. A librarian is. My mother is a librarian who never told me I couldn't read a book, even if it contained something with which she was uncomfortable. It's because of this encouragement and this freedom that I could read Melinda's story and not understand her reluctance to say anything.
Scroggins can keep anything he wants from his children. If he thinks that something is immoral or pornographic, he can choose to prevent them from reading it. What he cannot and should not do is keep anyone else from reading it.
Melinda doesn't say anything about her rape because she has been taught that sex is something you can't talk about and rape, especially date rape, is almost worse than that. Speak is, at its core, a beautifully written novel about finding the strength to overcome a traumatic experience and, in doing so, discover what it means to speak your mind and think for yourself even in the face of people who don't want to listen.
Teenager's opinions are so often dismissed because of hormones or naivety. Speak teaches us that our beliefs are important and our feelings are honest and worthy of attention. It teaches us that what we have to say matters, that speaking up and speaking out can create positive change, that remaining silent means suffering for something we didn't deserve in the first place . Speak teaches us that we need to make people listen if we want to be heard.
Banning books teaches us to keep things inside, unspoken, and well contained. It says that rape is pornographic, immoral, and filthy and that we shouldn't talk about it. That's why Melinda never said anything, because she was taught that rape was her fault, it was a dirty secret that she should just keep to herself.
On her blog, Laurie Halse Anderson asked her readers to post about what Speak means to them. For me, it has always been about using your voice when it matters and learning to speak up for yourself when it's clear that no one else will. Speak is about everything, in my opinion, that book banning prevents.